<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GPS Insight Blog &#187; toll collection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/tag/toll-collection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gpsinsight.com</link>
	<description>Advanced GPS Fleet Tracking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:48:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Counting &amp; Reconciling Tolls using GPS Insight fleet tracking</title>
		<link>http://blog.gpsinsight.com/2009/11/counting-reconciling-tolls-using-gps-insight-fleet-tracking/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gpsinsight.com/2009/11/counting-reconciling-tolls-using-gps-insight-fleet-tracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rdonat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ad Hoc Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CUSTOM APPLICATIONS OF GPS INSIGHT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Driver Accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS Tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bay bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landmark report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toll collection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gpsinsight.com/?p=1032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have a customer in San Francisco who wanted to be able to reconcile the # of trips they make across the Bay Bridge (since they pay a toll when coming into the city). Here is a picture of the landmark they defined (along with a nice 3D representation in Google Earth): We added a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a customer in San Francisco who wanted to be able to reconcile the # of trips they make across the Bay Bridge (since they pay a toll when coming into the city).</p>
<p>Here is a picture of the landmark they defined (along with a nice 3D representation in Google Earth):</p>
<div id="attachment_1034" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 522px"><a href="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/baybridge1.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1034" title="baybridge1" src="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/baybridge1-512x468.png" alt="GPS Insight Landmark of the San Francisco Bay Bridge" width="512" height="468" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GPS Insight Landmark of the San Francisco Bay Bridge</p></div>
<p>We added a &#8220;Passing Through&#8221; option to our standard landmark report to help with this requirement. Before this, the landmark visit would have required the vehicle to either stop or idle for a minute to register. If you click the &#8220;Passing Through&#8221; checkbox, it will count any activity through that &#8220;zone.&#8221;</p>
<div id="attachment_1035" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 522px"><a href="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/baybridge2.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1035" title="baybridge2" src="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/baybridge2-512x56.png" alt="GPS Insight landmark report adds &quot;passing through&quot; option" width="512" height="56" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GPS Insight landmark report adds &quot;passing through&quot; option</p></div>
<p>Now when running the report (which took less than 3 seconds), you get each time a vehicle went through that area (I&#8217;ve blurred out the vehicle names for customer privacy).</p>
<div id="attachment_1033" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 521px"><a href="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/baybridge3.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1033" title="baybridge3" src="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/baybridge3-511x181.png" alt="GPS Insight vehicle tracking landmark report" width="511" height="181" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GPS Insight vehicle tracking landmark report</p></div>
<p>This makes it easy to see that 7 vehicles went a total of 23 times across the Bay Bridge.</p>
<p>But how many tolls is that?</p>
<p>You only get charged on the way INTO the city. Exporting that report to Excel gives us some additional information such as heading (what direction the trip took through the landmark). So only Southwest trips should incur a toll. That shows 8 of them according to this Excel Screenshot:</p>
<div id="attachment_1036" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 522px"><a href="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/baybridge4.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1036" title="baybridge4" src="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/baybridge4-512x141.png" alt="How many tolls should we be charged across the Bay Bridge?" width="512" height="141" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">How many tolls should we be charged across the Bay Bridge?</p></div>
<p>We added Heading as well to the exported version of the report. Since space isn&#8217;t at a premium in Excel, we usually put all columns into the exported versions of the reports there.</p>
<p>This helps our customer, &amp; I thought it would be worth detailing here in case other customers can think of a good use for this.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Rob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gpsinsight.com/2009/11/counting-reconciling-tolls-using-gps-insight-fleet-tracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

