<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GPS Insight Blog &#187; detecting unauthorized vehicle usage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/category/gps-insight-benefits/detecting-unauthorized-vehicle-usage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gpsinsight.com</link>
	<description>Advanced GPS Fleet Tracking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:48:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>$3 million legal verdict for not having GPS tracking</title>
		<link>http://blog.gpsinsight.com/2010/11/3-million-legal-verdict-for-not-having-gps-tracking/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gpsinsight.com/2010/11/3-million-legal-verdict-for-not-having-gps-tracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rdonat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[detecting unauthorized vehicle usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extreme Return on Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fleet Tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[$3M jury verdict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avl tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fleet tracking software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gps fleet tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS Tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gps vehicle tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracking hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vehicle accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vehicle Tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vehicle tracking device]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gpsinsight.com/?p=2028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, to be accurate, if St. Louis had installed GPS in its vehicles, might not have lost a recent $3 million verdict in court. Here&#8217;s the story: A jury ordered St. Louis $3 MILLION to a woman who claims a municipal truck cut her off and led to a single vehicle crash. She did not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, to be accurate, if St. Louis had installed GPS in its vehicles, might not have lost a recent $3 million verdict in court.</p>
<p><a title="Jury orders S. Louis to pay $3M for Municipal Truck Crash" href="http://www.government-fleet.com/News/Story/2010/11/St-Louis-to-Pay-3M-for-Municipal-Truck-Crash.aspx?interstitial=1" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s the story</a>:</p>
<p>A jury ordered St. Louis $3 MILLION to a woman who claims a municipal truck cut her off and led to a single vehicle crash.</p>
<p>She did not have any evidence about the vehicle, department, or employee other than the fact that &#8220;a municipal truck caused her to swerve and avoid a collision.&#8221;</p>
<p>The crash time and location were certainly determinable.</p>
<p>If St. Louis had GPS on its vehicles, it would be trivial to determine if (and/or who) was the truck in question.</p>
<p>You could run a landmark report for a 2 mile area around the crash location at the exact time (20 minutes between 14:50 and 15:10 near the landmark called &#8220;Mesa Riverview&#8221; in this example):</p>
<div id="attachment_2029" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/stlouis1.png"><img class="size-large wp-image-2029" title="stlouis1" src="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/stlouis1-500x58.png" alt="Check to see if any vehicles were near the accident at that time" width="500" height="58" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Check to see if any vehicles were near the accident at that time</p></div>
<p>We quickly see there was no activity:</p>
<div id="attachment_2030" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 413px"><a href="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/stlouis2.png"><img class="size-large wp-image-2030" title="stlouis2" src="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/stlouis2-403x500.png" alt="No activity near the crash at that time" width="403" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">No activity near the crash at that time</p></div>
<p>Then you can pull the entire day to see if ANY vehicles went nearby that landmark, and when:</p>
<div id="attachment_2031" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/stlouis3.png"><img class="size-large wp-image-2031" title="stlouis3" src="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/stlouis3-500x59.png" alt="Pull the full day's history into a map" width="500" height="59" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Pull the full day&#39;s history into a map</p></div>
<p>Zooming in on our &#8220;pretend crash&#8221; landmark, we see that that there was NO ACTIVITY for that day, &amp; the closest to that landmark was the &#8220;Scion&#8221; at 10:03 driving by on the freeway, and &#8220;Adam 4000&#8243; at 12:20 several roads away from the incident.</p>
<div id="attachment_2032" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/stlouis4.png"><img class="size-large wp-image-2032" title="stlouis4" src="http://blog.gpsinsight.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/stlouis4-500x390.png" alt="Conclusive proof no city vehicle caused the accident" width="500" height="390" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Conclusive proof no city vehicle caused the accident</p></div>
<p>Now it&#8217;s entirely possible that the vehicle DID in fact cause the accident &#8212; however, right now it is the word of an unfortunate accident victim against the City &#8212; and apparently that word is worth $3,000,000.</p>
<p>That $3,000,000 would buy a city of 1,500 vehicles GPS Tracking for every vehicle for 5 years based on my calculations.</p>
<p>Plus they would have the benefits of GPS Tracking instead of just a way to avoid a jury verdict.  And maybe if the drivers knew they were being tracked, the accident wouldn&#8217;t have occurred in the first place if it was in fact caused by a city worker.</p>
<p>Rob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gpsinsight.com/2010/11/3-million-legal-verdict-for-not-having-gps-tracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

